Erica's tone is clearly disappointed and has a statement to be heard. Her facts are there supported by her articles. It is enough evidence to support her statement. But the thing that trips me out is that in each article, it has it's own perspective and tone itself. One says this and the other says that and that raises the question of who the heck is right? All each have the basics but each article does have it's own effect on telling the story. She seems to have a sentimental connection about the topic because the tone of voice seamed to be directed to violence.
Erica's writing techniques come as indirect because she does not fully come out head to head but simply stating her opinion. Her punctuation is there but a little dull when I think she wants to catch some attention to her phrases and other things. The message I interpreted was that she was emotionally disturbed and that she opposes to how many times the boy was shot and thought of racial profiling.
No comments:
Post a Comment